Bomba Dauda
In recent days, political conversations in Kaduna South Senatorial District and beyond have been dominated by the news of Senator Sunday Marshall Katung’s defection from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC). The move, though strategic, has triggered a flurry of emotional reactions, while opposition party oligarchy in the PDP mold described it as “sordid political strategy, ” critics and political commentators attempting to make a storm out of what, in truth, is a teacup. Wide range of people in the constituency sees it as well-intended move.
Senator Katung, who represents Kaduna South Senatorial District, has long been known for his pragmatic and people-centered approach to politics. His decision to realign politically with the centre, whether seen through the lens of personal conviction, constituency interest, or the evolving national political climate, is neither strange nor unprecedented in Nigeria’s democratic journey. Political movement and re-alignment are part of the lifeblood of democratic evolution, and Katung’s choice fits squarely within that norm.
However, a section of political actors and self-styled analysts have chosen to interpret his defection through narrow, partisan eyes. They accuse him of betrayal or opportunism, ignoring the wider context of his political journey and the deeper rationale behind the move. In their haste to criticize, they overlook Katung’s record of integrity, performance, and consistency in advocating for Southern Kaduna’s development.
The irony is clear: many of those now shouting the loudest have themselves shifted political allegiances when circumstances suited them. For them, defection is acceptable when it benefits their camp, but condemnable when it strengthens an opposing bloc. This double standard underscores a deeper problem in our political culture, where tribalism and sentiment often overshadow rational analysis.
Those familiar with Senator Katung’s philosophy know he is not a man given to reckless political adventurism. His actions are typically measured, rooted in consultation, and guided by a commitment to service. He has always placed people and progress above political labels.
To frame his defection as a betrayal is to miss the point entirely. The senator’s track record speaks volumes: his legislative engagements, youth empowerment initiatives, educational interventions, and advocacy for Southern Kaduna’s inclusion in national development. These are not the marks of a man driven by personal ambition, but one driven by purpose.
Those attempting to make political capital out of his defection should take a deep breath and reflect. Politics, at its best, is about building bridges, not burning them. Senator Katung’s move, if anything, may open new channels of opportunity for his constituents, aligning Southern Kaduna with the mainstream of national decision-making.
At the end of the day, history will not remember who shouted the loudest on social media, but who delivered results for the people. And on that score, Senator Sunday Marshall Katung’s name already stands tall.
